In another time’s forgotten space, I was overly concerned with weight. The heaviness of it all slowed me down. There could have been many reasons for this dynamic: I may have been out of shape; The gear could have been legitimately (and burdensomely) heavy—it was. And so, at the cost of many things, like my…
First Look: Moonlight Cruiser Carbon Superlight
Call it niche: A sub 1200g 114mm underfoot powder ski.

Responses
-
reminds me of the older Sportiva Vapor nanos etc. Definitely not ideal for your neck of the woods, but a great tool for the right day. And certainly not a quiver of one or even quiver of two ski.
Those Alptracks are great! But I would agree, they need to be carefully minded in all but the best conditions. Their weight combines with their shape (highly cambered and turny) to create a unique ski experience, requiring aggressive, forward skiing. The shape of these skis (along with the old sportiva skis) seems much more complimentary to the construction and intended use.
I will say I have very much enjoyed the Alptracks 89s for slow, steep skiing, even in variable conditions.
-
Come to think of it, now that you mentioned the Sportiva Vapor, I’ve snapped a La Sportiva Vapor Svelte, too.
-
the la Sportiva vapor might be the most snapped touring ski ever created… there are more single vapor skis in household in salt lake city than pairs…
-
Wow so much hate for the vapors! Not that I haven’t snapped a too-light-for-me ski.
More snapped vapors than fischer transalp RCs??? No way. But who knows. I think these sorts of skis you have to mount with a 6 release binding or lower regardless of your release preferences because your tibia is for sure stronger than the ski.
-
-
-





Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.