If you’ve spent any time walking uphill on skis in the Tahoe Basin, you’ve likely experienced the following: backsliding on a freshly set skin track, a desperate pole plant at a blown-out kick turn, the creeping realization that ski crampons might be your only hope of topping out. It’s a familiar struggle, and the culprit…
Straight to the Point: Tahoe, Your Skin Tracks Are Too Steep

Aidan Whitelaw track setting. Photo: Alex Shafer
Responses
-
Totally agree. Have experienced it.
-
It is believed Emerald Bay gets its beautiful hue from the tears of vanquished skinners.
-
That’s a lot of green-hued tears and a very funny comment.
-
-
I don’t feel like this is patronizing. When I started BC skiing 15+ years ago no one I knew said a word about the skin track angle. Mostly that was because no one I knew had ever skied with a guide, or had any formal training. And we were doing relatively short days where the exhaustion of a single climb didn’t really matter. Over the years, the concept of shallower skin track angles sort of became more self-apparent, but it really wasn’t until I got Rob’s book that it clicked for me. Then I skied with a guide a few times, and it made even more sense.
Now I probably quote Rob nearly every time I go out and back it up with the guide on multi day trip perspective. It’s an easy and non-confrontational way to have a discussion and bring the group to a more consistent skin track angle strategy.
The thing is, you really need to experience a good skin track to understand how bad the steep ones are. We ski a lot of lower elevation brushy terrain that forces occasional awkwardly steep moves or other tricks you wouldn’t ordinarily choose to do. But when you can put in that nice 13 degree track that uses the terrain and avoids kick turns, man that’s magic. So yes, put in a better one, but having a conversation and making a goal for better group tracks is the best long term strategy.
-
The way I see it, putting in a good track is a service to the community who will use the track until the next storm. Put in a nice track that is useable as it becomes firm or crusty and it minimizes the need for many tracks marring the snowscape.
No one is obligated to perform community service. If I am working, it is both fun and my job to make sure the skin track is workable (at worst) and pleasant (at best) for my clients. Recreating, I usually have a bit more tolerance for a steep or poorly done track, depending on the conditions.
I often get a good chuckle out of seeing the early morning efforts of a certain Teton local, who has a talent for improbably steep and direct tracks.
All this being said, I think THR is a great place to educate and discuss skin track practices. I certainly agree with Barry that behind the track setter is not the correct location for airing these grievances. -
Putting in a good track shows that you know what you’re doing rather than being a hack. Plain and simple.
-
-
Barry, I agree with your point that it’s easier to recognize a good track than set one.
At the same time I thought this article was a good call for everyone to try and do better.Here is another resource:
https://gearysguiding.com/art-of-up-tracking-handbook/ -
Knowing very well two of the individuals responsible for setting 90% of the steepest skin tracks you’ve ever gone up in popular zones in the Tahoe Basin, I’ve often given them light-hearted grief for their 35% gradients. Having first done a bulk of my ski touring apprenticeship under the disciples of Ruedi Beglinger, the father of skin track etiquette in Canada, I too was as frustrated as the author with the slick, vertical tracks going to the peaks of the best ski touring zones in Tahoe. I frequently complained about them to others just like the author, with mostly a similar set of points. But if you happen to beat the two individuals–which is a near impossible feat–to the base of these lines on a powder day, you’ll quickly learn the pitch isn’t built out of ego, inexperience or malice. Having once or twice been lucky enough to be the first up on these zones, I quickly learned that through the bouldery, old-growth forests of the Tahoe Basin, the steep line is the most natural line. When I tried to set the track to that perfect 11-13% gradient, I found myself prematurely kick turning, side-slipping below the tree in my line to keep the pitch consistent, side-stepping up the boulder and falling off of any natural consistency and cohesion in the track. We don’t have many wide open, smooth alpine bowls like Chamonix or BC, so the steep trail becomes the most efficient for the setter. It was only then I realized that these two horse-lung equipped and iron-leg-driven skin track setters aren’t madmen, they’re following the natural line. So since then, I thank them for setting the track, drink some concrete at the trailhead to harden the fuck up and stopped worrying about it…because I’m getting a great workout in and it’s just skiing.





Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.