











The low toe arms indicate the toe unit is oriented in descent mode.
Take my money! Wow.
Really interested in this but…I’m wondering if their toe release is their touring binding “release value” or actual DIN certified values?
Is the Hy another Vipec/Tecton in that it’s lighter but not in the same (safety/reliable release) category as the Shift?
The DIN certification still seems to be an open question as far as I can find, however it is apparent that the toe piece is ‘alpine style’ and does not engage the pins. That seems to promise later release and elasticity more like a shift or duke PT.
There is a chance that ATK, being a small company, decided not to go through the expensive testing to certify the binding, or that it hasn’t yet passed/been awarded certification. Time will tell on that front.
On TGR a shop owner mentioned that ATK have not pursued certification (yet). This is kind of understandable from a cost and time perspective.
The good news is, with a lateral release at the toe, you should be able to take them to any ski shop and have the release tested with your boots.
Good point on getting it shop tested. I know Skimo tests the bindings they carry so I’ll be interested to hear what they find with consistency and effectiveness of release. I don’t think most users know that RV values are not the same as DIN values so set them the same and then complain when they pre-release, or don’t release when they should (speaking from personal experience).
IMO the Hy isn’t game changing unless it has similar alpine binding elasticity and predictable release characteristics as the Shift – so we’re comparing apples to apples.
ATK confirmed on their Instagram that they are pursing certification!
Cripple Creek Backcounty has a good video review posted on YouTube
How about a comparison to the Trab TR1.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.